-
thehair-notentertained reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
-
n0th1ngt0s33h3r3 reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
-
octopusonrollerskates reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
-
octopusonrollerskates likes this
-
ossahumiliata likes this
-
alice44 likes this
-
eclecticdreamweaver likes this
-
hairtrending reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
-
leftistnaija reblogged this from trotskitty
-
masonraburn likes this
-
trotskitty reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
-
truth-has-a-liberal-bias reblogged this from oinonio
-
wateringgoodseeds likes this
-
viciousneutral likes this
-
introvertedart reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
-
introvertedart likes this
-
kaiamar likes this
-
theyangziriver reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
-
littleblackkittycat likes this
-
butchrosser likes this
-
seminaldesigner likes this
-
reagan-was-a-horrible-president reblogged this from oinonio
-
reagan-was-a-horrible-president likes this
-
oinonio posted this
“The report, by researchers at the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, looked at Romney’s call for a 20% income tax cut for everyone, that he says he would finance by ending existing (and as-yet-unnamed) tax deductions. They assumed for their analysis that Romney would try to eliminate tax breaks favoring the rich as much as possible to pay for his plan, before turning to popular middle-class deductions on health care and mortgage payments to make up the remaining gap. But even allowing for that highly generous baseline, the average American family making less than $200,000 would still have to pay $2,000 more of their income in taxes while the richest .1% would see an average net tax cut close to $250,000.”